@article{oai:edo.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000984,
 author = {大和田, 智文 and 西山, 真司},
 journal = {江戸川大学紀要, Bulletin of Edogawa University},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {P(論文), 本研究では，本来は社会通念上責められる行為であっても，その行為が生じた背景や条件が異なった場合に，行為者に対する人びとの評価や態度に違いが生じるかを検討した。その際，大学生88 名（男性56 名，女性32名）を対象に質問紙調査を行った。本研究では，行為者の動機づけ2 水準（「出来心による窃盗」vs.「経済的困窮による窃盗」），窃盗の対象物の価値（すなわち対象価）2 水準（「低価値の漫画」vs.「高価値の参考書」）を要因とする2 要因参加者間計画を用いた。検討の結果，動機づけが経済的困窮の場合は，出来心の場合よりも視点取得が有意に高くなる傾向がみられた。また，出来心の場合は経済的困窮の場合よりも否定的態度が有意に高くなる傾向がみられた。以上より，社会通念上責められるべきである窃盗行為において，行為者の動機づけの違いが，その行為に対する人びとの判断を左右する可能性が示唆された。, In this study, we examined whether people’s evaluations and attitudes toward the actors would differ if the backgrounds and conditions in which the acts occurred were different, even if the acts were intrinsically blamed by social norms. At the time, a questionnaire survey was conducted on 88 university students（36.4% female）. In this study, A 2（motivation of the actors : opportunist vs. theft due to economic distress）× 2（value of the theft objects : low-value cartoon vs. high-value reference book）between-subjects design was used. As a results, when the motivation was economically distressed, perspective-taking tended to be significantly higher than that in the case of opportunist. In addition, there was a tendency for negative attitudes to be significantly higher in the case of opportunist than in the case of economic distress. Taken together, this study suggested that in the theft acts that should be blamed in the intrinsic norm,the difference in motivation of the actors may influence the judgment toward the actors’ behavior.},
 pages = {49--59},
 title = {犯罪への動機づけおよび対象価が行為者に対する認知的評価に及ぼす影響},
 volume = {31},
 year = {2021},
 yomi = {オオワダ, トモフミ and ニシヤマ, シンジ}
}